If content is king, collaboration is queen.

Archive for November, 2009


links for 2009-11-30

Nov 30, 2009 Author: Joanna | Filed under: Uncategorized
  • "The messages – drawn from ‘text pagers’ carried by people in an official capacity – range from snap news reports to messages between members of essential services as well as expressions of support for loved ones. They were, Wikileaks said, “a completely objective record of the defining moment of our time.”"
    (tags: data)

links for 2009-11-29

Nov 29, 2009 Author: Joanna | Filed under: Uncategorized
  • "…I did almost consider surrendering to popular pressure and dedicating an entire column to my analysis of whether such an arrangement is ever likely to happen and what it would mean for Google, and the wider world. But then I realised that I’m paid to write long, and that a column like that would read as follows (in its entirety)… Will News Corp Remove Its Content From Google, And If So What Will It Mean For The World? No. And nothing. …which feels lazy, even for me."

links for 2009-11-26

Nov 26, 2009 Author: Joanna | Filed under: Uncategorized

links for 2009-11-25

Nov 25, 2009 Author: Joanna | Filed under: Uncategorized

links for 2009-11-24

Nov 24, 2009 Author: Joanna | Filed under: Uncategorized
  • "…people are increasingly likely to discuss and interact with content away from the site where it was originally posted. Grigorik studied 1,000 of the feeds his company has monitored for the past three years and found that about 60 percent of the interactions PostRank recorded happened on sites other than where the content was originally posted. "As a publisher or blogger, I want to see these conversations," he says. "

links for 2009-11-23

Nov 23, 2009 Author: Joanna | Filed under: Uncategorized

links for 2009-11-19

Nov 19, 2009 Author: Joanna | Filed under: Uncategorized

links for 2009-11-18

Nov 18, 2009 Author: Joanna | Filed under: Uncategorized
  • "Using the time-frame of the comments, our website location and the IP addresses in the WordPress e-mail, he tracked it back to a specific computer. The headmaster confronted the employee, who resigned on the spot."
    (tags: socialmedia)
  • ""Pledging to "rewrite the economics of newspapers", Harding said the Times would charge for 24-hour access to that day's edition of the paper alongside a subscription model, but dismissed the idea of micro-payments for individual articles.
  • After announcing late last month that it would create the role of Social Media Editor, the BBC has appointed Alex Gubbay as the first to fill the position.
  • Influence

    Nov 18, 2009 Author: Joanna | Filed under: Uncategorized

    It was a shame that I couldn’t stay longer at the 140 Character conference at O2 Indigo yesterday.

    But, in the short time I was there, I did get to listen to a very interesting talk by Stephen Fry. How Stephen is discovering, using, experiencing and reacting to Twitter is fascinating.

    One point he made particularly made me think. He explained his annoyance at how some in the mainstream press had suggested he had orchestrated the online reaction to Jan Moir and also the breaking of the Trafigura super-injunction.

    Stephen was annoyed that he was being singled out when many, many others had particpiated in both these events. As he correctly pointed out, it was unfair to others who had been more involved and had not been recognised. It was, he argued, lazy journalism.

    Actually, Stephen went on to argue, he doesn’t have any influence at all. His followers are intelligent beings who can make up their own minds about things. If he had asked them to stick their heads in the oven, would they have done it, he asked? It is a point he explains more fully in a post he wrote last month.

    This gets right to the heart of my concerns with the perceptions of influence and responsibility that people have online. I have two points which I would very much appreciate your thoughts on:

    Point 1: If a newspaper with a circulation twice the size of The Times (or 3.5 times the size of The Guardian) joined a campaign (even it it was late in the day), how much influence would you credit them with having over readers that joined in? How much responsibility does the newspaper have for the outcome of that campaign? How would you feel if this was a campaign with aims that you agreed with? How would you feel if it was something you disagreed with?

    My point being that Stephen has over 1 million followers on Twitter. Why should his influence on them be any more or less than a newspaper has on its readers? How do we judge that?

    If we can say his influence is the same, then surely we have to say that his responsibilities when wielding that influence must be the same. We need to look at this both for campaigns we agree with and ones we don’t because we will react differently to each. I suspect we are more likely to claim the newspaper acted irresponsibly if we don’t agree with their campaign’s aims.

    Point 2: A very interesting chat with someone who understands the intricacies of UK libel law revealed this nugget to me: when it comes to libel, you do not necessarily have to sue the person who was first to utter the libel. You can sue anyone who repeated the defamation.

    In this situation clients are advised to choose to go after those people who can afford to pay damages. The people most likely to fall into this category? Large organisations (like newspapers) and anyone with a large influence and (as a result) a potentially larger-than-average bank balance.

    Of course Stephen is a pretty sensible tweeter and is unlikely to be retweeting libellous statements and getting involved with questionable campaigns. But, I worry about his lack of awareness of the influence he has and, therefore, the potential consequences of it. I don’t think he is the only one who thinks like this.

    It seems, as I’ve mentioned before, that individual influence and responsibility online is a tricky thing for us all to guage. I think the consequences of that are interesting and slightly worrisome.

    links for 2009-11-17

    Nov 17, 2009 Author: Joanna | Filed under: Uncategorized

    Archives

    About

    I am The Guardian's Digital Development Editor.

    I am an advocate of using social media and other online communication tools to better understand, collaborate with and serve those who we reach with our journalism.

    The views expressed in this blog are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employers.

    More...


    What others have said

    "That most enterprising of newspaper bloggers..."
    Roy Greenslade

    "She thinks in the new way: open, networked, relying on and trusting the gift economy and respecting her readers and what they know..."
    Jeff Jarvis

    "A wise and forward-thinking journo ninja"
    Glyn Mottershead

    "Self-regarding, self-referential and self-indulgent..."
    Quaker



    Get updates by email

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner




    Find me!