People have been asking what I plan to do with @bhampostjoanna after I leave the Post at the end this week.

The answer seems to cause some consternation: I am keeping the account and changing the name to reflect the new publication I work for.

“But these are contacts you’ve built up during your time at The Post! You can’t just take them with you,” has been one of the responses. (NB. It is worth noting that The Post has been very happy for me to retain my account – the comments have mostly come from people outside of journalism).

I guess it raises the question: who owns a journalist’s account on a social network, if they use it purely for work?

The answer seems simple to me: what journalist doesn’t take their contact book with them when they leave (or at very least a copy of it)? The nature of the job is that you build relationships with people and, although some will leave you when you switch titles, others will be contacts throughout your working life.

The benefit of a Twitter account is, of course, that all my contacts are publicly available for anyone to see. So, unlike a contact book, I can’t run off and hide it when I leave!

This blog post is the start of letting people know that on March 9 I hope to change @bhampostjoanna to @timesjoanna.

Alternate Birmingham Post Twitterers include:

@marcreeves, editor
@mikehughes, executive editor
@steve_nicholls, multimedia editor
@paulmdale, public affairs editor
@jonwalker121, political editor
@tomscotney, business reporter, legal and financial
@anna_blackaby, business reporter, creative industries
@mandybrain, marketing development manager

Share this
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • Fark
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • Propeller
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • TailRank