<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How should we tech out a newsroom?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joannageary.com/2008/07/05/how-should-we-tech-out-a-newsroom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joannageary.com/2008/07/05/how-should-we-tech-out-a-newsroom/</link>
	<description>If content is king, collaboration is queen.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:15:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jez Higgins</title>
		<link>http://www.joannageary.com/2008/07/05/how-should-we-tech-out-a-newsroom/comment-page-1/#comment-613</link>
		<dc:creator>Jez Higgins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannageary.wordpress.com/?p=323#comment-613</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ll no doubt benefit from having a big pile of stuff to take out and about - cameras, fancy phones, etc - and from the range of hosted services - YouTube, Vimeo, etc - you can call upon.  However, every now and again you&#039;ll need to run a bit of software of your own devising, need to host some collosally large file, or some such.  In which case, you need a publically visible server you can call your own.  It probably doesn&#039;t need to be particularly powerful, it doesn&#039;t need to be in your office, it doesn&#039;t even need to actually exist (a virtual machine slice would serve just as well), but it needs to be yours and under your direct control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ll no doubt benefit from having a big pile of stuff to take out and about &#8211; cameras, fancy phones, etc &#8211; and from the range of hosted services &#8211; YouTube, Vimeo, etc &#8211; you can call upon.  However, every now and again you&#8217;ll need to run a bit of software of your own devising, need to host some collosally large file, or some such.  In which case, you need a publically visible server you can call your own.  It probably doesn&#8217;t need to be particularly powerful, it doesn&#8217;t need to be in your office, it doesn&#8217;t even need to actually exist (a virtual machine slice would serve just as well), but it needs to be yours and under your direct control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.joannageary.com/2008/07/05/how-should-we-tech-out-a-newsroom/comment-page-1/#comment-612</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannageary.wordpress.com/?p=323#comment-612</guid>
		<description>Good points Jo.

I think there is still a culture of skills for a role rather than skills for life in some newsrooms. People are not in a mindset to play. Not their fault. They are in an industry where training has traditionally been something you where sent on or rewarded with.

Play, exploration with a low expectation of return ie.we don&#039;t expect you to generate 12 stories from this. Is, for me, the only way to get people excited about stuff.

But as Paul points out that&#039;s a mindset issue to change and not an easy one.

As for the media shift idea of a newsroom. I think its good but without the background level of interaction with technology you are talking about it becomes a bit like that &#039;known unknowns&#039; speech. How are you supposed to know what will make a good story on video if you don&#039;t know.

There is a lot more groundwork to do with hearts and minds.

As for a Wii...I think that&#039;s a great idea but I think many in your newsroom will moan at the head start you have on the Wii but will keep shtum when they see you boxing :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points Jo.</p>
<p>I think there is still a culture of skills for a role rather than skills for life in some newsrooms. People are not in a mindset to play. Not their fault. They are in an industry where training has traditionally been something you where sent on or rewarded with.</p>
<p>Play, exploration with a low expectation of return ie.we don&#8217;t expect you to generate 12 stories from this. Is, for me, the only way to get people excited about stuff.</p>
<p>But as Paul points out that&#8217;s a mindset issue to change and not an easy one.</p>
<p>As for the media shift idea of a newsroom. I think its good but without the background level of interaction with technology you are talking about it becomes a bit like that &#8216;known unknowns&#8217; speech. How are you supposed to know what will make a good story on video if you don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p>There is a lot more groundwork to do with hearts and minds.</p>
<p>As for a Wii&#8230;I think that&#8217;s a great idea but I think many in your newsroom will moan at the head start you have on the Wii but will keep shtum when they see you boxing <img src='http://www.joannageary.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kitting out media for the future &#171; Gary Andrews</title>
		<link>http://www.joannageary.com/2008/07/05/how-should-we-tech-out-a-newsroom/comment-page-1/#comment-611</link>
		<dc:creator>Kitting out media for the future &#171; Gary Andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 17:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannageary.wordpress.com/?p=323#comment-611</guid>
		<description>[...] Geary, journalism, social media, training      Joanne Geary asks a very interesting question: How should we tech out our newsrooms? I&#8217;d like to extend that question to tech-ing out any media [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Geary, journalism, social media, training      Joanne Geary asks a very interesting question: How should we tech out our newsrooms? I&#8217;d like to extend that question to tech-ing out any media [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Ashton</title>
		<link>http://www.joannageary.com/2008/07/05/how-should-we-tech-out-a-newsroom/comment-page-1/#comment-610</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Ashton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 14:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannageary.wordpress.com/?p=323#comment-610</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure how to best answer the question but a more general thought sprang to mind which might apply. It&#039;s unrealistic, I think, for journalists to use &lt;i&gt;everything&lt;/i&gt; in the media toolbox just as it&#039;s unreaslistic to expect them to use everything in the current journo toolbox. The trick, I think, is to get them to explain how they currently do their job, from chasing down leads to managing information, and investigate ways they can use digital tools to compliment and improve that.

So someone who does a lot of face-to-face could use a portable audio recorder and produce podcast-type shows by editing that together. Someone who does a lot of online research could use delicious or similar. Someone who does a lot of opinion-style writing could benefit from the feedback on a blog. You&#039;ll know the better examples but that&#039;s how I&#039;d approach it.

Maybe provide packages of tech kit for each general sort of journo in your team? An audio kit, a blogging kit, a video kit, that sort of thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure how to best answer the question but a more general thought sprang to mind which might apply. It&#8217;s unrealistic, I think, for journalists to use <i>everything</i> in the media toolbox just as it&#8217;s unreaslistic to expect them to use everything in the current journo toolbox. The trick, I think, is to get them to explain how they currently do their job, from chasing down leads to managing information, and investigate ways they can use digital tools to compliment and improve that.</p>
<p>So someone who does a lot of face-to-face could use a portable audio recorder and produce podcast-type shows by editing that together. Someone who does a lot of online research could use delicious or similar. Someone who does a lot of opinion-style writing could benefit from the feedback on a blog. You&#8217;ll know the better examples but that&#8217;s how I&#8217;d approach it.</p>
<p>Maybe provide packages of tech kit for each general sort of journo in your team? An audio kit, a blogging kit, a video kit, that sort of thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Groves</title>
		<link>http://www.joannageary.com/2008/07/05/how-should-we-tech-out-a-newsroom/comment-page-1/#comment-609</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Groves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 07:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannageary.wordpress.com/?p=323#comment-609</guid>
		<description>&quot;If you do not use YouTube or Facebook, for example, how can you really understand how they can be used in story telling?&quot;

And if some of your best writers are not interested in blogging...

Without wishing to upset former colleagues in various newsrooms (!), newspaper offices are very insular and closed environments in so many respects.
Change = bad, like in so many other aspects of life.

It needs a significant culture change which won&#039;t be achieved easily - old printing vs electronic; b&amp;w vs colour; tabloid vs broadsheet. All these &quot;battles&quot; have been fought and won (not sure about the tabloid one though) since I became a trainee 20(ish) years ago and they all took time.

But having a very good, respected, enthusiastic journalist as Development Editor pushing the sort of ideas you&#039;ve listed above and explaining to peers why they would make their job easier and better is a big step in the right direction.

Training is very important, but not necessarily the traditional HR-approved format. Some former colleagues I&#039;ve spoken to - either still in newspapers or doing other things - still can&#039;t get their head around the idea that &quot;play&quot; and all the things they do at home (Facebook et al, games consoles, gadgets generally, trawling the web etc) are things that fit perfectly into this new way of working.

Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you do not use YouTube or Facebook, for example, how can you really understand how they can be used in story telling?&#8221;</p>
<p>And if some of your best writers are not interested in blogging&#8230;</p>
<p>Without wishing to upset former colleagues in various newsrooms (!), newspaper offices are very insular and closed environments in so many respects.<br />
Change = bad, like in so many other aspects of life.</p>
<p>It needs a significant culture change which won&#8217;t be achieved easily &#8211; old printing vs electronic; b&amp;w vs colour; tabloid vs broadsheet. All these &#8220;battles&#8221; have been fought and won (not sure about the tabloid one though) since I became a trainee 20(ish) years ago and they all took time.</p>
<p>But having a very good, respected, enthusiastic journalist as Development Editor pushing the sort of ideas you&#8217;ve listed above and explaining to peers why they would make their job easier and better is a big step in the right direction.</p>
<p>Training is very important, but not necessarily the traditional HR-approved format. Some former colleagues I&#8217;ve spoken to &#8211; either still in newspapers or doing other things &#8211; still can&#8217;t get their head around the idea that &#8220;play&#8221; and all the things they do at home (Facebook et al, games consoles, gadgets generally, trawling the web etc) are things that fit perfectly into this new way of working.</p>
<p>Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
